The U.S. and Islam: Trading Safety for Tolerance

Radical Islam stands not only as a threat to the Western civilization, but to the lives of Americans themselves.  When will the American government recognize the need for defense?   Or will we continue to elect leaders that apologize for the “blasphemies” the American people have committed against the Muslim faith and blacklisting those who recognize jihad as terrorism?

Islam has a long, violent history, beginning with Muhammad and the forming of the Qur’an in the early 600’s. The revelations of Allah through the prophet Muhammad are the core teachings of Islam, an eloquent compilation of laws for spiritual matters, as well as everyday living.  The jihad is a central teaching of the Qur’an, and there are two kinds of jihad—the greater and the lesser. The greater jihad refers to an individual’s spiritual struggle against sin, but the lesser jihad mobilizes Muslims in the annihilation of non-believers.

From the beginnings of his political career, Muhammad led his people to attack infidels; this is commanded in Qur’an multiple times. Just to provide a few examples: “whoever changes his Islamic religion, kill him” (Sura 2:217) and “make war on unbelievers and the hypocrites, and deal rigorously with them. Hell shall be their home: an evil fate.” (Sura 9:73).  Furthermore, the Islamic Constitution clearly declares war on Western civilization by calling for the execution of those guilty of apostasy, or the rejection of Islam, and requiring military training for readiness.

Humans act and react according to a decided purpose and the outlook derived from that purpose.  Americans tend to see the world through a Western lens.  We subconsciously assume that all religions are inherently peaceful, despite the violence found in Christian religious history.  However, the difference between acts of violence committed in the name of Islam and those committed in the name of Christianity is simple; destroying nonbelievers actually adheres to the Islamic faith, whereas this kind of violence deviates from the teachings of Christ found in the New Testament.

Furthermore, an important aspect of Islamic culture to consider is their all-encompassing loyalty to the holy text. Muslims take the Qur’an a lot more seriously than American culture takes the Bible in the West.  The Qur’an is not a set of guidelines to the followers of Muhammad; it is a set of laws that devout followers take absolutely literally. Islam is not going through a phase, nor do they need a viable reason to seek to destroy us; their purpose is to spread Islam at all costs.  They want to wage war on the West because our culture and values are antithetical to their existence.

We cannot continue to either ignore or appease threats such as the rise of the Muslim Brotherhood, specifically HAMAS, and their ardent anti-Semitism, the adoption of Islamic law by other nations such as Sudan, and the evidence of nuclear weapons in Iran. Domestically, they’re infiltrating Washington, supporting Occupy Wall Street, and advocating political correctness, so much so that our leaders’ are willing to sacrifice free speech for the sake of Islamic cooperation.

America can react in one of two ways. Either the Obama administration will continue letting Islam negatively influence our way of life, slowly assimilating to the culture linked to terrors like honor killings and therefore rendering ourselves susceptible to attack, or we can elect a leader who realizes the danger of radical Islam and seeks to provide protection for the American people. We need someone in the White House who will not revolve foreign policy around religious tolerance, but recognize the need for a backbone when dealing with people who have a religious and cultural responsibility to actively pursue our demise and destruction.  The American people need to reclaim exceptionalism and embrace true liberty so that America’s founding principles may be preserved for future generations.

We seem to have forgotten who attacked us on September 11, 2001.  We seem to have forgotten their motivations.  We seem to have forgotten their convictions.  I hope that we’ll remember when we enter the voting booth.

Additional Credits to:

Armstrong, Karen. (2001). Islam: A Short History. Weidenfeld & Nicolson History.

Spencer, Robert. (2002). Islam Unveiled. Encounter Books: San Francisco, CA.

Sydney Phillips // Lee University // @sydphillips

Related News

72 Responses

Leave a Reply
  1. Alan
    Jan 06, 2012 - 11:12 PM

    Correlation proves nothing. I don’t doubt that the Middle East and North Africa tend to be less free. However “not being free” is hardly monocausal. Can you run a cross tabulation to actually isolate Islam as the source of being not free? I suspect that the not being free has a lot to do with 1. Economics 2. The Ottoman empire. 3. Climate and 4. US and Soviet jockeying for control. This isn’t statistical evidence indicting Islam as much as it is statistical evidence indicting arid climates and being at the crossroads of the world. The only thing I’m twisting and turning about is the idiot’s apostrophe that you added.

  2. Alan
    Jan 04, 2012 - 11:04 PM

    Well Jim, I think I that would make me the worst prop in history as 1. I’m not a Muslim and 2. you didn’t actually show any analysis showing a higher propensity for violence (and you didn’t even attempt to control for other factors like economics) all of the supposed evidence tells us that some Muslims are violent, though we should really be interested in what proportion of Muslims are violent compared to other populations after controlling for non-Islam factors.

    • Jim
      Jan 05, 2012 - 09:02 PM

      Offered only for the purpose of making the Alan’s of this world twist and turn in their defense of tyranny:

      Freedom House (, established with the support of the socialist Franklin D. Roosevelt, was established in 1941 in New York City. Each year it rates the degree of freedom in all regions of the world.

      The 2011 report rates the [Muslim] Middle East and North Africa as the least free of all regions in the world: 78% rated “not free.”

  3. Alan
    Jan 04, 2012 - 04:35 PM

    First, no I’m not a Muslim as 1. Taqiyya wouldn’t apply as I’m not in imminent danger sitting at my computer and 2. There are tons of people like me who aren’t terrified of Islam, many of which are non-Muslims, yet for some reason you’ve arbitrarily assigned me to the subset of people who are Muslims.

    Jim, you always force me to respond to your arguments, yet you never respond to mine, (Nazis and Muslims are misanalagous, statisitical evidence is necessary etc). Please, a little fairness.

    As to the business about killing apostates, if you ask the majority of Western Muslims, they’ll mostly tell you that those are either historical remnants, mistranslations or something- in any event they don’t actually follow them (In the same vein that most Orthodox Jews don’t actually want to stone people).

    You give a sort of one line argument about my demand for statistics. I don’t really understand what you’re saying, please elaborate. (though I am happy that you actually read my arguments, I was beginning to wonder).

    As to your other arguments, you haven’t really shown anything but quotes by famous people. This is a case of special pleading. We wouldn’t decide what we think about Jews based on what Bobby Fischer thinks would we? Sure, he’s a smart guy, but smart people believe all sorts of weird things for very non-smart reasons. Quotes aren’t really evidence.

    As to KS Lal I think this is a rather silly argument. Probably some population decrease was due to conversion or natural famine. If significant portions were due to Muslim skullduggery, you need to show statistical controls for other factors contributing to violent behavior in order to indict Islam.

    • Jim
      Jan 04, 2012 - 05:26 PM

      It appears that Islam on this forum generates no interest from anyone but you and me. You have served as my prop to illustrate how Muslims respond to facts about Muslim crimes — but no one is “watching”! So, there is no purpose in commenting further on the issue, at least here.

      Allahu Akbar, adios — and may the wind always be in your face.


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Copyright © THE COLLEGE CONSERVATIVE. Managed by Epic Life Creative