Student Loans Are Drowning Opportunity

Student loans are an important aid for those attending college, and many students depend on them in order to attain higher education. Because of this, a startling trend has emerged.

In September 2011, the Department of Education released a statement expressing the default rates for student loans for fiscal year 2009:

“The U.S. Department of Education today released the official FY 2009 national student loan cohort default rate, which has risen to 8.8 percent, up from 7.0 percent in fiscal year 2008. The cohort default rates increased for all sectors: from 6.0 percent to 7.2 percent for public institutions, from 4.0 percent to 4.6 percent for private institutions, and from 11.6 percent to 15 percent at for-profit schools.”

Federal education assistance programs are abused at all levels, but the most notably at the institutional level, where students are allowed (granted, by federal authority) to borrow far more money than needed for tuition.  As a result, many students claim refunds in excess of six thousand dollars off of a refund check.  Considering the national graduation rate is stagnant despite climbing enrollment rates, the debt continues to increase among those who choose not to graduate.

Students who receive grants and scholarships are particularly guilty.  Many of them have begun, in a lot of cases, to use grants and scholarships to pay their tuition and then take on federally backed loans to use as spending money.  In fact, the loans are promoted by the government in the form of tuition “assistance” packages.  In other words, the government is encouraging students to take on unnecessary debt.

The government is bleeding money through the student loan system. With more and more students returning to school due to the current recession, it is getting worse.

Government should be working towards a solution, but instead the Obama Administration is doing the exact opposite. President Obama used — or some might say abused – his executive powers to revamp the student loan program and allow students to refinance at a lower rate.  This move made it easier for students to acquire more debt; more debt equals more dependency.

A very simple solution could curb this disturbing trend.  If the government would implement a cap on refund checks at one thousand dollars, this would allow students enough money to pay for books and small incidentals, while decreasing the amount of student loan debt that they could acquire.  A cap would also keep people from entering college to buy cars and televisions, as I have personally seen.  The average student loan debt carried by a college graduate is over twenty-five grand.

The amount of federal aid that a college receives should be tied to their graduation rates — nothing else.  The New York Times submitted a report entitled Sublime Opportunity, in which the Education Trust found that “in 2008, only 22 percent of the first-time, full-time bachelor’s degree students enrolled in for-profit colleges graduate within six years, compared with 55 percent at public institutions and 65 percent at private non-profit colleges.”

USA Today recently reported that for-profit schools, such as trade schools and online colleges, accounted for over half of all student loan defaults belonging to students. In fact, the same report showed that the University of Phoenix receives eighty-eight percent of its total revenue from federal student loan programs.  Oddly enough, students attending these types of institutions only make up about 10% of higher education students nationwide.  For-profit schools must be held to higher standards or risk having their federal aid privileges revoked.

In the previously mentioned article, USA Today projects that student loans will top 1 trillion dollars this year. In order to begin reversing the economic crisis, we must stop allowing the abuse of student loans while decreasing our dependency not only the Department of Education, but also on debt.  With the current dire financial situation in the United States, we cannot allow these abuses to take place.

Mark Mayberry // University of Tennessee at Chattanooga // @MarkMayberry85

Related News

8 Responses

Leave a Reply
  1. Kyle Olson
    Jan 08, 2012 - 07:32 PM

    or just make higher education more affordable. what a novel solution

    Reply
  2. Scott
    Jan 06, 2012 - 12:41 PM

    @Hmmm, when your posts/ideas are hard to read, it makes the reader give you less credibility. Sophistication in composition no, but if no one can understand your point, then why even bother.

    Reply
    • Hmmm,,,,Really?
      Jan 06, 2012 - 02:56 PM

      Back @Scott, Let’s see, no one understood my point yet you seemed to understand enough to disagree. What I can see is that you have being righteous and condescending mixed up with being right.

      OK, keep that up and have a great life.

      Reply
  3. Hmmm,,,,Really?
    Jan 06, 2012 - 11:03 AM

    Back @Scott, I see, you like to attack the writing skills when the opinion doesn’t match your own. OK. Did it ever occur to you that the writing was knowingly written the way it was in spite of its failure to make the grade with you. Whoops! I guess I missed the rule where all posts were required to meet some sort sophistication in composition. Is it composition over content? Perhaps that is why its called the College Conservative blog, all form, no function.

    Reply
  4. Scott
    Jan 06, 2012 - 10:36 AM

    @Hmmm, I do not see anywhere in the article that says that ALL student loans are bad. The author is writing about the abuses of funds for college. And maybe you should go back through your Comp books and brush up on your writing skills.

    Reply
  5. Hmmm,,,,Really?
    Jan 06, 2012 - 09:37 AM

    Another example of conservative blindness is the willingness of “College” Conservatives to use federally guaranteed loans to legitimize their use of the word “college” as an adjective in describing their conservativity. Else, they would just be what? Unemployed, underprivileged, and under-educated conservative morons.

    The use of this blog by anyone who takes out a student loan is no different than being the vicious dog that bites and mangles a person’s hand who would dare offer them a bit of food. Ever heard of biting the hand that feeds you? You have it in your power to stop feeding yourself at the tit of big government before you decide to chew up those who offer you welfare loans to advance your education.

    Reply
  6. Tabitha
    Jan 06, 2012 - 08:53 AM

    I don’t think the government needs to be mixed up in the student loan business in the first place. Like many things, the involvement of a third party (notably the government) causes cost to become less of an issue. I was a good student who got some decent scholarships for college. I attended a private college and graduated (a semester early, thankfully) with $12,000 in student loans. I paid them off in five years because it was a priority for me to get out of debt. That is another problem with students. Many don’t see the danger in beginning their adult lives with a mountain of debt.

    Reply

Trackbacks/Pingbacks

  1. Student loans may be issue in presidential race «

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Copyrıght 2014 THE COLLEGE CONSERVATIVE.

Facebook

Twitter