obamaromney

One Week Later: Bursting the Bubble

One week ago, Conservatism suffered a monumental loss. Part of what makes the loss so shocking is that no one seemed to see it coming. Conservatives of every brand believed momentum was on their side – they were wrong. Pundits and talking heads will debate why Republicans lost so handily for weeks to come (and at some point I may join them), but before we begin the process of self-criticizing, it is important to step back and ask why there was no perceived need to do so before the loss.

Since the election, several writers for whom I have great respect pointed out that conservatives live in their own media bubble. Conservatives visit Drudge and Breitbart when they are online, tune into Fox on the TV, and listen to talk radio. All of these media outlets have their purpose, but that purpose is namely to bring balance, not to create a bubble of isolation. If the only website you ever read is Drudge Report, then you probably saw that a professor at the University of Colorado predicted a Mitt Romney win with 75% certainty. Although, you probably never saw Nate Silver’s prediction that President Obama would win with 85% certainty. If you only watch Fox News, you were probably bombarded with polls that showed a majority of voters saying they trusted Mitt Romney more than President Obama to fix the economy. But you probably missed the polls showing that President Obama was better liked.

I’ve always considered myself to be a well-rounded reader. As a law student, I don’t have much free time, and therefore don’t bother paying for cable, so Fox News isn’t even an option. I’ve honestly never been a big fan of talk radio, and when it comes to newspapers, I even frequent The New York Times and The Atlantic occasionally. However, the results of this election served as a wake up call.

On my Facebook homepage I have a self-created list titled “Traditionalism.” The list contains updates from all my favorite blogs and websites that post on Theology, Culture, Politics, etc. In the week since the election, I created a new list entitled “Progressivism.” No, I’m not converting, and no, I’m not looking for new ideas. What I am looking for though, is to understand the opposition and how to engage it. It is no longer enough to preach to the choir. Our reasoning and rhetoric must be restructured, without compromising our principles, to directly engage our opposition at their best and to answer their concerns.

The Republican Party has a serious messaging problem, and it’s something they have never quite been able to overcome, but this year it has taken them to new lows. The problem results in an inability to connect with people of different political persuasions. Conservatives, by their very nature, have a dangerous tendency to only play defense; but when facing a culture on the brink, Conservatives have no choice but to engage it head on.

The ever-increasing polarization of politics makes confrontation inevitable. As Chesterton said, “The modern world must somehow be made to understand that a view may be vast, broad, universal, liberal, and yet come into conflict with another view that is vast, broad, universal, and liberal also. There is never a war between two sects, but only between two universal Catholic Churches.” And so we should be prepared on every front. If Conservatism is a comprehensive, transcendent philosophy that offers solutions for a host of issues, then it is time we prepare ourselves for the inevitable clash with a comprehensive ideology that offers competing solutions.

For too long we have lived in our own media bubble and have told ourselves that America is a center-right country. The insulation blinded us from seeing how stagnant we have become, and how much ground we have actually lost. It’s time to burst the bubble.

Brian Miller | George Mason University | @BrianKenMiller

Related News

3 Responses

Leave a Reply
  1. Jim Prokop
    Nov 18, 2012 - 12:27 AM

    Brian: Pretty good job! While I may disagree with you in quite a few areas, as Chelle, did I find your post to be pretty well reasoned and rational. You avoided calling people moochers, socialists,God haters and the like. My question this: why are you wasting your time wallowing in the immaturity and extremism posing as conservatism, usually found on this blog? Good luck with your legal career.

    Reply
  2. Kay
    Nov 14, 2012 - 07:11 PM

    You make great points, and as an outsider looking in you’re one on the most levelheaded conservatives I’ve ever read. I myself, would not self categorize as a conservative but I’m not totally liberal either. I mention this because for people like me conservatives are really scary, because the messages and the methods are so extreme. When conservatives hear about the eccentricity of liberals it’s from the conservative media. When liberals and “inbetweeners” hear about conservatives it’s directly from those conservatives. Then the messages replay over and over, and it forces us to choose the lesser of two evils over and over again. Do I want other people to be forced to pay for my birth control or life choices? Not at all, but do I want to support candidates that are not clear on what rape is? Never going to happen.

    Reply
    • Chelle
      Nov 14, 2012 - 07:30 PM

      “Do I want other people to be forced to pay for my birth control or life choices?”

      This right here is the problem with the messaging. No one was paying for any body’s birth control – it was going to be a part of a health care package like any other and groups even had the option of letting employees and health care providers work one on one, leaving the company out of it.

      But it was blown up to be this offense against religion and paying for someone to be a slut by the media.

      Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Copyrıght 2014 THE COLLEGE CONSERVATIVE.

Facebook

Twitter