Phil Robertson

Crime of a Voice

Somewhere out in the Louisiana backwoods, there’s a duck hunter huddled under a misty evergreen waiting for his prey to poke out into his rifle sights. He waits, fueled by the familiar rewards of diligence and discipline. The only sound around him is the gentle babbling of a nearby stream and the ghastly wind blowing between the trees. The only smells are from the dew on the tree bark and the earthy must of the dirt clutched beneath him. Yet he waits on in silence as a bead of sweat drips down from his temple.

Such is the way of the hunter. Such is the way of Phil Robertson.

A man whose loves in life are and always will be God, family, and duck hunting. These are the values he has held true to above all else without compromise or exception. Extraordinarily, his recent fame has done nothing to sway Phil from what he believes in and stands for. Instead, he spoke his mind in a recent interview concerning the topic of homosexuality:

Don’t be deceived. Neither the adulterers, the idolaters, the male prostitutes, the homosexual offenders, the greedy, the drunkards, the slanderers, the swindlers — they won’t inherit the kingdom of God. Don’t deceive yourself. It’s not right.

They were words taken from scripture and spoken in alignment with his biblical view of today’s society. He is consumed with living the Nazarene lifestyle; delving out into the wilderness, relying on himself and God alone. He could leave behind all the endorsements, praise, and viewership as quickly as it all found him. These trivial things mean as much to him as the dirt between his boots.

So now the media will devour him. In a manner reminiscent of last year’s Chick-Fil-A controversy, voices from all over have already been sounding off on the issue. A&E has quickly placed him on an ‘indefinite hiatus’ following the publication of the GQ’s January article, as his opinions are seen as harmful and dangerous to the viewing public.

Never mind the fact that he goes on to say in the article, “We never, ever judge someone on who’s going to heaven, hell. That’s the Almighty’s job. We just love ’em, give ’em the good news about Jesus—whether they’re homosexuals, drunks, terrorists.” It doesn’t matter how he’d treat a homosexual, the sheer fact alone that he views what they’re doing as a sin is enough to write him off as an ignorant, archaic, bible-thumping, misinformed, misguided, and intolerant bigot who deserves the brunt of criticism and punishment. He should be struck down from his position of reach and influence, cast back into obscurity and left alone with his vile and disgusting opinions.

So says the steady stream of his detractors, anyway.

This is the way public opinion works in this country nowadays. If it goes against the all-powerful tides of a current societal view, you will assuredly be drowned out under the voices of scorn and rebuke. Tolerance of unpopular views has become intolerable. What we are left with is a fear of character, a hesitancy to stand behind that which has helped defined the person you are. Speaking out for differing views and challenging the status quo is a dying practice in this society. There is an overwhelming sense of complacency and slumbering that has descended upon hearts and minds, infecting the pool of individual thought and stagnating true social and political progress.

The only foul deed that can be accredited to Phil Robertson is an attempt to put a little bit of God back into the mainstream. Phil isn’t the type of man though to find fulfillment in television ratings or appearing in interview specials. Out there in God’s backyard with the quiet company of the deer, squirrels, birds, and bugs, Phil will find himself much more at home than in the nonsensical world around him.

Try as it might, the world cannot touch Phil Robertson because he answers to an authority none other than the Almighty Himself. I cannot envy the ducks, however, that he’ll get to spend more time hunting.

Related News

6 Responses

Leave a Reply
  1. Natalie
    May 13, 2014 - 06:32 PM

    Lol when has Christianity ever not dominated the social status quo? You can defend his bigotry all you want, but at least have the intellectual honesty to admit that this backlash against Robertson is not in any way a reflection of America’s imagined crusade against wealthy, white, Christian men. Also, I find it just a little too ironic that you’re making him out to be a saint while simultaneously emphasizing the fact that he kills innocent animals for fun. Not that I expected you to understand the real meaning of victimhood…

  2. revolutionist90
    Dec 26, 2013 - 12:11 PM

    Great article. You set up an imagery of Robertson at the beginning which allowed a good flow for the rest. It is sad and troubling how tolerance is a one way street nowadays. But I think, for the sake of votes and power of one party, this schism between the (mostly) judeo-christian communities and the LGBT communities will probably continue.

  3. CynicalGuy42
    Dec 26, 2013 - 11:55 AM

    In response to Chris: I disagree with his statements about blacks, but from what I understand they are not what got him canned. Another thing too, he does have freedom of speech to say those things.
    In response to Fred: People are really going after him for making those statements. You may want to check out these quotes.

    • Chris
      Dec 27, 2013 - 05:03 PM

      I agree, I’m surprised people were less interested in his statements on race in America. But he didn’t get “canned” or fired, he just got suspended. They could lift that tomorrow without having to re-sign a contract. I think they thought he was hurting their brand and they wanted to show they are doing something about it, and now they can decide what they want to do.

  4. Chris
    Dec 25, 2013 - 02:00 PM

    I’d love to know how you think about his view that black people were better off during the Jim Crow era than now illustrate Christian values.

    I guess it is mainstream Christian values, seeing as a recent USC study showed that more religious people are in America, the more likely they are to have bigoted racial beliefs and attitudes.

  5. Fred
    Dec 25, 2013 - 01:57 PM

    What’s the problem here? Are you upset with how the market is working? If people want to watch this religiously-fueled bigot, then start a TV channel and put him on a show. You or he can even sign up for public access just like every other citizen.

    The idiocy coming from GOP figures is predictable but disappointing- they keep yelling about the 1st amendment but don’t seem to realize that the 1st amendment does not dictate how private businesses in the TV industry must continue featuring their contracted performers regardless of what they do or say. The first amendment says CONGRESS shall pass no law that abridges free speech, and even that has loopholes (defamation, libel, etc.). Congress didn’t pass any law that prevents this Louisiana bird murderer from spouting his religion. A private company decided he was bad for the brand and benched him.

    Were you upset Alec Baldwin got canned? What about Bill Maher getting tossed from ABC for his comments? Or is this just more selective, unprincipled outrage?


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Copyright © THE COLLEGE CONSERVATIVE. Managed by Epic Life Creative